| Maybe
I'm biased because I love the outdoors, but I don't understand the arguments
against protecting the environment and becoming energy independent. I understand
that people will have different opinions about how to address the issue,
but ignoring it seems rediculous. While I think the arguments that climate
change doesn't exist are weak, even if that is ones belief there are still
plenty of good reasons for protecting the environment and becoming energy
independent. Lets start with energy independence. As a country we are injecting
huge sums of money into the most volatile regions of the world because
of our dependence on foreign oil. Becoming energy independent may not solve
our foreign policy problems, but it would certainly make them less complicated.
Second, there is no 'do over' on this issue. If we don't take care of the
planet now we have the potential to create a situation that is irreversible.
This seems to be the quintessential issue where one should err the side
of caution. Future generations won't complain if their air and water is
too clean, or that forests and other wild areas have been preserved.
The Democrats have accepted that this is a serious issue, but the Republicans
have lagged behind. Senator McCain and Governor Huckabee are the only
two Republican candidates to seriously address this issue. Governor Huckabee
makes a compelling argument that as stewards of this earth we have a
responsibility to address environmental issues. Senator McCain has been
a leader on climate change and has promoted the idea of a cap and trade
policy that reduces carbon emmisions through business incentives, thus
keeping the economy strong and protecting the environment simultaneously.
Hopefully Republicans will catch up with Senator McCain and Governor
Huckabee and realize that this doesn't need to be an issue of politics,
this can be a win win situation if addressed by both sides in a serious
manner.
|
